The Importance of How Boards Decide Actions

By Kelly G. Richardson, Esq., CCAL, HOA Homefront Column 

In the HOA world, corporate formalities can often seem to discourage and frustrate quick decisive action. However, there are important reasons the process must be followed, and the corporate process is a critically important legal protection for volunteers. 

Volunteer immunity from Civil Code 5800(a)(1) is limited to acts “performed within the scope” of the officer/director’s association duties. This echoes similar language commonly found in directors and officers insurance policies. Volunteers who skip the HOA approval process and act without board authority may be outside of the protections of both the statute and the insurance. This could be a disaster for volunteers who “take the bull by the horns” instead of waiting for their board colleagues to decide upon a particular action. 

Corporations are legal fictions recognized by law as “persons” with rights to own property, sue, and be sued. However, as legal fictions, corporations only act through boards, and board actions are proven through written minutes. Minutes prove that a legal commitment is the corporation’s.  Without minutes documenting corporate authority, a volunteer may not be able to prove a vendor commitment was the HOA’s and not theirs personally. While that scenario would be a nightmare for the volunteer, it can easily be avoided by waiting to sign contracts until the board approves them. Managers and volunteers should insist that board authority to act is confirmed in writing and then soon as possible is recorded in minutes.

Corporate powers come from statutes and governing documents, and actions outside that corporate authority are called “Ultra Vires,” a Latin term meaning “outside the powers.”  In business corporations, officers often are the primary deciders, but in HOAs boards are the primary decision-maker. If an officer acts outside those powers and without board approval, it is not corporate action, and the officer is exposed to risk.

Sometimes urgency requires an immediate decision to be made — such as calling an emergency contractor, for example. Boards may take emergency actions via email, under Civil Code Section 4910(b)(2). If that isn’t possible, it’s critical that directors acting for the corporation in emergencies as soon as possible obtains formal corporate approval, called “ratification” of the action taken, which ratification must be documented in minutes. 

California’s Open Meeting Act (Civil Code §4900-4955) contains many mandatory governance procedures — in addition to those in the governing documents. That law requires advance notice of board meetings, bans actions outside of board meetings, limits use of executive sessions, and requires prompt availability of draft minutes.

Boards violating the Open Meeting Act often invoke explanations of efficiency or convenience. However, boards violating the legally required corporate process by deliberating outside of open meetings may expose those decisions to legal challenge as outside the corporate authority. 

Sometimes directors step out ahead of the board in their zeal to “get things done,” acting without documented board authority. However, what if the board later disavows the director’s action, leaving the director personally exposed to that contract liability? What if it turns out that the action turns out to be a mistake and wasn’t really the best for the HOA? The board might refuse to ratify the action, leaving the director personally exposed.

Board motions, votes, and recorded minutes prove that the corporation is liable, not you. Embrace them- they protect you.

Survey Says: Ethics Still Matter in Business

The Darden Report The University of Virginia

By McGregor McCance

Does the stakeholder approach to business still matter in a climate dominated by raw, power-play decision-making?

Stakeholder proponents like Darden School of Business Professor Ed Freeman say the answer is yes, even as corporate executives pull back on commitments to workers and political leaders today enact massive changes that will deeply affect employees and other stakeholders.

“The opportunity for businesses to step up is huge,” Freeman said.

New research suggests that is exactly what people want.

A recent survey gauging what people expect from corporate America ranked ethical leadership as the No. 2 expectation people have for business. That result was up from the No. 7 spot last year.

Similarly, respondents listed the expectation that corporations “communicate transparently” rose to the No. 4 rank this year, from No. 12 the previous survey.

The No. 1 result: People expect and want fair, living wages.

The annual Americans’ Views on Business Survey, conducted by JUST Capital, is intended to identify what the public expects from business, what issues matter most, and where there are opportunities for business leadership.

JUST Capital was co-founded in 2014 by a group from business, finance and civil society who “believed that business and markets can and must be a greater force for good.” The founding members include investor Paul Tudor Jones II, who earned an economics degree from the University of Virginia.

Freeman, who collaborates regularly with JUST Capital, said this year’s survey results are not surprising, as they fit with a pattern of public sentiment for ethical, fair behavior toward employees and other stakeholders such as suppliers, communities and investors.

“If you ask American people what they want about their business, they want them to essentially create value for their stakeholders. That’s the short form of what this survey says,” Freeman said. “They place fair wages, dealing with customers in the right way, and ethics, at the top of the list. This isn’t some weird idea. It’s what people expect.”

Stakeholder capitalism is defined broadly as an approach to business in which a company or organization considers how its actions will affect all stakeholder groups, rather than fulfilling a responsibility only to shareholders. The approach urges consideration of employees, customers, suppliers, the community and the environment – as well as shareholders.

“The opportunity for businesses to step up is huge.”

ED FREEMAN, DARDEN PROFESSOR

Stakeholder capitalism or stakeholder theory have long been core to Darden’s curriculum and School values. Freeman, who has taught stakeholder theory and ethics at Darden since 1987, is credited with articulating the original stakeholder tenets in a business context in his 1984 book “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.”

JUST Capital said the latest survey results mirror sentiments expressed by voters in the November 2024 election cycle: “Americans are concerned about their economic well-being, about how they are treated as consumers, about being able to support their families. And they appear distrustful of institutions as they repeatedly call for increased transparency, corporate accountability and leadership.”

For Freeman, the results bolster Darden’s commitment to teaching responsible leadership, while giving corporate and government leaders more reason to think about how their decisions affect others.

“When the effects are not good, you’re partially responsible for that,” he said. “Stakeholders are responsible too, but you’re partially responsible for the effects of your actions. That’s just ethics 101.”

The survey’s top 10 issues that members of the public identify for business:

  1. Pays a fair, living wage
  2. Acts ethically at the leadership level
  3. Supports worker wellbeing
  4. Communicates transparently
  5. Provides benefits and work-life balance
  6. Supports workforce advancement and training
  7. Treats customers fairly
  8. Offers fair pricing
  9. Creates jobs in the U.S.
  10. Protects customer privacy

About the University of Virginia Darden School of Business

The University of Virginia Darden School of Business prepares responsible global leaders through unparalleled transformational learning experiences. Darden’s graduate degree programs (MBA, MSBA and Ph.D.) and Executive Education & Lifelong Learning programs offered by the Darden School Foundation set the stage for a lifetime of career advancement and impact. Darden’s top-ranked faculty, renowned for teaching excellence, inspires and shapes modern business leadership worldwide through research, thought leadership and business publishing. Darden has Grounds in Charlottesville, Virginia, and the Washington, D.C., area and a global community that includes 18,000 alumni in 90 countries. Darden was established in 1955 at the University of Virginia, a top public university founded by Thomas Jefferson in 1819 in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Non-Resident Directors Spark Debate in Lower Manhattan Co-op

Financial DistrictManhattan HABITAT Magazine

At a large co-op in Lower Manhattan, one of the nine board members recently sold his apartment and moved to another state. A second member is living in a foreign country with his family and subletting his apartment, saying he will eventually return to the building. Both are still serving on the board of directors. Is this legitimate? What can shareholders do if they’re unhappy with the arrangement?

The law does not dictate that co-op directors must be residents of the building, or even shareholders in the cooperative, replies the Ask Real Estate column in The New York Times. However, a cooperative’s governing documents could contain such qualifications and requirements.

Start with the bylaws. Do they allow people who don’t live in the building to serve on the board of directors? Do they require shareholders who have sold their shares to relinquish their board seats?

It’s possible that the bylaws are silent on these questions. But if residency is required, shareholders could compel the resignation of the nonresident directors, says Leni Morrison Cummins, chair of the condominiums and cooperatives practice at the law firm Cozen O’Connor.

The situation at this Lower Manhattan co-ops raises a larger issue facing many co-ops: Is the board serving the interests of the residents, or of investors? Over time, cooperatives have allowed shareholders not just to have their primary residence elsewhere or rent to a subletter, but to buy shares as investors.

“This,” Cummins says, “has led to many cooperatives having split populations: one of residential shareholders and one of investor shareholders.” Typically, she adds, resident shareholders want to invest to make their daily lives better and to maintain restrictions on occupancy and sublets. Investor shareholders, on the other hand, often prefer to keep costs down and to loosen restrictions on occupancy and sublets.

Shareholders can vote to create a residency requirement, but if your building has many investors, this could be difficult. “If the shareholders don’t amend the bylaws to restrict board membership, try to develop a meaningful relationship with the nonresident board members and share your concerns,” advises Andrew Bart, senior counsel at the law firm Kagan Lubic Lepper Finkelstein & Gold.

And remember that a housing cooperative is a democracy, so disgruntled shareholders can participate in the next election. “Campaigning and collecting proxies can take some effort,” William Geller, counsel at the firm Braverman Greenspun. “But if the (shareholders) wants to change the direction of the building, that can be a very effective way to get things done.”

City Partners With AI to Rework Condo Property Tax Assessments

New York City HABITAT Magazine

The robots are coming! The robots are coming!

New York City’s arcane, unfair and unloved property tax system is about the get help from a new source: artificial intelligence.

The Department of Finance has partnered with technology firm C3 AI for a six-month pilot program that will explore using AI to calculate the assessed value of the city’s residential condo properties, Crain’s reports. The program will use machine learning along with market and sales data, and it will investigate how practical it is to base property tax bills on sales comparisons for condo buildings with more than 10 units. Under the current system, co-op and condo assessed values are based not on sale prices but on the the value of comparable rental properties. (Assessed values, a fraction of market values, are part of the equation used to calculate property tax bills.)

C3 AI’s “approach is considered a more fair and transparent way to assess properties,” and the program could boost property tax revenues if successful, according to a notice published in the city record.

C3 AI’s appraisal platform would allow the city to identify and resolve data discrepancies, appraise several properties simultaneously and identify sites that require additional judgment, according to a promotional video on the company’s website. Every appraisal comes with “an evidence package and sales comparables that explain how the AI property value was generated.”

Valuations play a huge role in New York’s notoriously byzantine and controversial property tax system. Although officials tend to undervalue buildings, which leads to a lower tax bill, owners still frequently go to court to challenge their valuations.

The city released its tentative property tax assessment roll for fiscal year 2026 in January, which put the overall market value of the city’s buildings at about $1.6 trillion, up 5.7% year over year. It anticipated a 7.3% increase in the market value for condos, co-ops and rental apartment buildings.

If successful, the C3 AI pilot program could lead to a longer-term contract. Meanwhile, the organization Tax Equity Now New York (TENNY) is in the middle of a lengthy legal battle seeking to upend New York’s overall property tax system. The group argues that it breaks federal fair-housing laws by overtaxing neighborhoods where people of color make up the majority of residents and breaks the state real property tax law by overtaxing rental properties compared to owned homes.

The current law puts a cap on annual property tax increases, which has had the effect of lowering tax bills in neighborhoods where property is appreciating rapidly, while punishing neighborhoods that are experiencing slow or no appreciation in values.

The TENNY suit dates back to 2017, and the Court of Appeals revived it last year.

Survey Says: Ethics Still Matter in Business

The Darden Report The University of Virginia

By McGregor McCance

Does the stakeholder approach to business still matter in a climate dominated by raw, power-play decision-making?

Stakeholder proponents like Darden School of Business Professor Ed Freeman say the answer is yes, even as corporate executives pull back on commitments to workers and political leaders today enact massive changes that will deeply affect employees and other stakeholders.

“The opportunity for businesses to step up is huge,” Freeman said.

New research suggests that is exactly what people want.

A recent survey gauging what people expect from corporate America ranked ethical leadership as the No. 2 expectation people have for business. That result was up from the No. 7 spot last year.

Similarly, respondents listed the expectation that corporations “communicate transparently” rose to the No. 4 rank this year, from No. 12 the previous survey.

The No. 1 result: People expect and want fair, living wages.

The annual Americans’ Views on Business Survey, conducted by JUST Capital, is intended to identify what the public expects from business, what issues matter most, and where there are opportunities for business leadership.

JUST Capital was co-founded in 2014 by a group from business, finance and civil society who “believed that business and markets can and must be a greater force for good.” The founding members include investor Paul Tudor Jones II, who earned an economics degree from the University of Virginia.

Freeman, who collaborates regularly with JUST Capital, said this year’s survey results are not surprising, as they fit with a pattern of public sentiment for ethical, fair behavior toward employees and other stakeholders such as suppliers, communities and investors.

“If you ask American people what they want about their business, they want them to essentially create value for their stakeholders. That’s the short form of what this survey says,” Freeman said. “They place fair wages, dealing with customers in the right way, and ethics, at the top of the list. This isn’t some weird idea. It’s what people expect.”

Stakeholder capitalism is defined broadly as an approach to business in which a company or organization considers how its actions will affect all stakeholder groups, rather than fulfilling a responsibility only to shareholders. The approach urges consideration of employees, customers, suppliers, the community and the environment – as well as shareholders.

“The opportunity for businesses to step up is huge.”

ED FREEMAN, DARDEN PROFESSOR

Stakeholder capitalism or stakeholder theory have long been core to Darden’s curriculum and School values. Freeman, who has taught stakeholder theory and ethics at Darden since 1987, is credited with articulating the original stakeholder tenets in a business context in his 1984 book “Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach.”

JUST Capital said the latest survey results mirror sentiments expressed by voters in the November 2024 election cycle: “Americans are concerned about their economic well-being, about how they are treated as consumers, about being able to support their families. And they appear distrustful of institutions as they repeatedly call for increased transparency, corporate accountability and leadership.”

For Freeman, the results bolster Darden’s commitment to teaching responsible leadership, while giving corporate and government leaders more reason to think about how their decisions affect others.

“When the effects are not good, you’re partially responsible for that,” he said. “Stakeholders are responsible too, but you’re partially responsible for the effects of your actions. That’s just ethics 101.”

The survey’s top 10 issues that members of the public identify for business:

  1. Pays a fair, living wage
  2. Acts ethically at the leadership level
  3. Supports worker wellbeing
  4. Communicates transparently
  5. Provides benefits and work-life balance
  6. Supports workforce advancement and training
  7. Treats customers fairly
  8. Offers fair pricing
  9. Creates jobs in the U.S.
  10. Protects customer privacy

About the University of Virginia Darden School of Business

The University of Virginia Darden School of Business prepares responsible global leaders through unparalleled transformational learning experiences. Darden’s graduate degree programs (MBA, MSBA and Ph.D.) and Executive Education & Lifelong Learning programs offered by the Darden School Foundation set the stage for a lifetime of career advancement and impact. Darden’s top-ranked faculty, renowned for teaching excellence, inspires and shapes modern business leadership worldwide through research, thought leadership and business publishing. Darden has Grounds in Charlottesville, Virginia, and the Washington, D.C., area and a global community that includes 18,000 alumni in 90 countries. Darden was established in 1955 at the University of Virginia, a top public university founded by Thomas Jefferson in 1819 in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Collins: How to make sure you have adequate homeowners insurance

by Neil Collins for the San Jose Spotlight

For the last couple years, access to homeowners insurance has been a problem.

Many carriers have left the state for various reasons, such as huge payouts from natural disasters and the regulatory climate. It’s made purchasing a home even more difficult, and now we are seeing existing homeowners having their insurance carriers deny them for renewal. There is much debate happening in Sacramento on the best way to address these issues. Still, the recent wildfire events in Southern California are not going to help the situation. For some insurance carriers, it could be the last straw, forcing them to pull out of the state.

So, what can you do to ensure adequate coverage for your home in the event of a catastrophe?

First off, now is a good time to reach out to your insurance professional and review your policy. I reached out to one of the most knowledgeable insurance professionals that I know for this column, Michelle Lin, insurance broker for Red Wave Insurance Services.

Lin recommends you let your insurance agent know about all the upgrades you have done. Many firms use the Marshall & Swift system to determine rebuild value. However, if you expect them to replace a luxury kitchen or custom bathroom, they need to know about those remodels.

It’s also not a bad idea to consult with a local contractor on typical rebuilding costs in the area. The rebuilding cost of your home is not the same as the market value of your home. Many times, homeowners forget to let their insurance agents know about renovations done on the property, which leads them to be underinsured. Some updates could even lead to better premiums — such as newer roofs.

Another policy detail you want to keep an eye on is the “loss of use” portion of your policy, which can cover some living costs when your residence is uninhabitable. It covers temporary housing, such as a hotel or apartment, moving costs, extra food and restaurant bills, storage units, etc. This coverage doesn’t pay for your mortgage, as you are still obligated to your lender to keep making your payments.

Lin also recommends meeting with your insurance agent annually to review your coverage. Keep the receipts of all your high-value purchases and store them on a cloud server. Lay out all your valuable jewelry and take a photo. Lin offers to take a room-by-room video for her clients, because when disaster hits it is easy to forget what to claim.

If you own a condo or townhouse, you have an additional step. You need to review your covenant, condition and restriction, also known as CC&R, to know what your homeowners association is responsible for. In addition, take proactive steps like trimming overhanging trees and removing debris next to the home. Main insurance carriers are now using satellite imaging to determine the risk factor of insuring properties.

San José Spotlight columnist Neil Collins is CEO of the Santa Clara County Association of Realtors, a trade association representing more than 6,000 real estate professionals in Santa Clara County and surrounding areas. Contact Neil at neil@sccaor.com.